Deliberative transformations of opinion in computer- mediated discussions
نویسندگان
چکیده
The present study focuses on deliberative potential of computer-mediated discussion forums and it approaches this question by linking the course of on-line discussion with its opinion dynamics. It is suggested that the process of opinion transformation, which is central to the theories of deliberative democracy, should be seen as a function of discussion in which it takes place. Computermediated forums are especially appropriate for this because of their tendency to organize dialogic networks of individuals in which opinions about the issues discussed are the main benchmarks of the participants’ identities. This idea was tested with a quantitative analysis of the forum, set up specifically for this study. We were able to operationalize the initial idea by using the so-called deliberative poll. Consistent with the expectations of deliberative democracy about rational expression and sharing of opinion our analyses show a close
منابع مشابه
On argumentative constraints Forms of argumentation between deliberative frameworks and powers of political expression
2007 1. The French reference is : Francis Chateauraynaud, « La contrainte argumentative. Les formes de l'argumentation entre cadres délibératifs et puissances d'expression politiques », Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, n°136, 2007, pp. 129-148. 1 This text originates from numerous discussions that I have had during the seminar on the " Sociology of controversies and public debates " (EHE...
متن کاملParticipation and Persuasion via Computer-Mediated Communication: Anonymous versus Identified Comments
This paper reports the results of an experiment where anonymous and identified comment groups discussed five ethical issues via computer-mediated communication (CMC). The results suggest that comment anonymity leads to more participation and less change in opinion than comment identification, while equality of participation and post-discussion agreement do not differ. Further analysis of the ch...
متن کاملOnline vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation: Effects on Civic Engagement
Deliberation is considered to produce positive effects on public opinion, in that it exposes participants to alternative perspectives and rational arguments. However, whereas benefits of face-to-face deliberation have been supported by many empirical studies, the effects of online deliberation remain unclear to date. This research compares the effects of online and face-to-face deliberation in ...
متن کاملNew Teaching/learning model for medical students, according to integration of usual educational methods in Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences
Introduction: In the classrooms of medical students, some times we can see problems that affect teaching quality. For solving common problems, some ways for effective teaching were selected. Including of pre-study, Computer-mediated learning package, quiz exam every teaching session, and group discussion. Then combination of this methods as PCQG model performed for pilot study in the kidney cha...
متن کاملSocial media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression
This manuscript aims to assess the potential of social media as a channel to foster democratic deliberation. It does this by examining whether the types of discussions that citizens maintain in two of the most used social media channels managed by the White House – Facebook and YouTube – meet the necessary conditions for deliberative democracy. For this purpose 7230 messages were analyzed and a...
متن کامل